Legal Opinion
People v. Bligen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 24, 2006PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth L. Sussman, J.), entered on or about May 25, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the use of the risk assessment instrument is barred by the stipulation of settlement (96 Civ 1657 [DC]) entered into by the parties, including defendant, in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [SD NY 1998]). This stipulation clearly provides that for each plaintiff whose risk level was to be redetermined…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. O'NealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.