Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1904No. S.F. No. 2600PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
A rehearing in this case was ordered. In the Department opinion it was said:—
“The defendant, said insurance company, issued a policy of insurance upon the life of Edward E. Thomas for the benefit of his wife, Emily C. Thomas, the plaintiff herein. Said policy was dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, January 25, 1898. The premium thereon was $90.90, payable semi-annually, on the twenty-fifth days of January and July each year. The policy acknowledged the receipt of the first payment as of the date of the policy, and contained a promise to pay the beneficiary in case ‘of the death of said insured…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hodsdon v. Guardian Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Tobin v. Western Mutual Aid SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Spencer v. Citizens' Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Zimmerman v. Continental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Brown v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Jewett v. Northwestern National Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Wright v. Salzberger & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.