Legal Opinion

DCI MRI, Inc. v. Geico Indemnity Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 18, 2012No. Nos. 4D10-1458, 4D10-1459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, C.J.

In these consolidated appeals, a medical provider, the assignee of two independent insureds, appeals a final summary judgment concerning the application of the 2008 PIP statute to two policies that were in existence at the time of the statute’s enactment. The county court granted summary judgment for the insurer, finding that the 2008 PIP statute allowed the insurer to pay less than 80% of the fee charged. The court then certified the following question:

Whether the fee schedules included in the legislature’s January 1, 2008 reenactment/revision to the Florida no-fault law apply to policies…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MenendezSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. Kingsway Amigo Insurance Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Geico Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Geico General Insurance v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. All Family Clinic of Daytona Beach Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  4. Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API