Legal Opinion · Dissent

Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 3, 2013No. SC12-905Published

1DissentCanady, J.

I would answer the rephrased certified question in the affirmative, quash the decision on review, and disapprove DCI MRI, Inc. v. Geico Indemnity Co., 79 So.3d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Geico Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc. (Virtual I), 79 So.3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); and Kingsway Amigo Insurance Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So.3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Accordingly, I dissent.

The view adopted by the majority and the district courts rests on the interpretive fallacy that sections 627.736(5)(a)l and 627.736(5)(a)2, Florida Statutes (2008), respectively establish mutually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingsway Amigo Insurance Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Geico Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. DCI MRI, Inc. v. Geico Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API