Legal Opinion
Geico General Insurance v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 25, 2012No. 3D11-581PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalter, J.
This is another1 in a series of appeals and petitions addressing the 2008 amendment to the personal injury protection (PIP) insurance law authorizing insurers to limit reimbursable charges to 200% of the reimbursable rates under the Medicare Part B fee schedules, section 627.736(5)(a)2.f., Florida Statutes (2008). In this case, the policy issue date and effective date, the insured’s accident date, and the delivery of covered diagnostic services (two MRIs) all occurred after the January 1, 2008, effective date of the amendment.
The sole issue before the county court was one of law: did the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MenendezSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. HernandezSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Geico Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- DCI MRI, Inc. v. Geico Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
- GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Gables Insurance Recovery, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- In re Guardianship of MullOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hallandale Open MRI, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hallandale Open MRI, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.