Legal Opinion

Samuels v. Greenspan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1899No. 570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J. :

This was an action under the forcible entry and detainer act, originally brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error before a justice of the peace in the city of Topeka. A trial there resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. An appeal was taken to the district court, where it was again tried and judgment for the plaintiff again rendered. The case is now before us for review.

There are five assignments of error, by the first four of which it is alleged that the court below erred in overruling the demurrer of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Becker v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. City of Syracuse v. W. F. Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peddicord v. BerkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Duncan v. RiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Nenzel v. Rochester Silver CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Phillips v. FahertyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
  5. Smith v. Hood Rubber Products Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API