Legal Opinion

Wiman v. Tomaszewicz

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 9, 1994No. 05-93-00148-CVPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Leo Wiman appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of George R. Tomaszewicz in this suit to collect a deficiency due under a promissory note. In two points of error, Wiman contends that the trial court erred in (1) granting summary judgment for Tomasz-ewiez and (2) denying his motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that (1) limitations did not bar Wiman’s deficiency claim against Tomaszewicz, (2) any modification of the note did not release Tomaszewicz from liability under the guaranty, and (3) a genuine issue of material fact exists as to Wiman’s cause…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  3. Ocean Transport, Inc. v. Greycas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. Marshall v. Ford Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  5. Mid-South Telecommunications Co. v. Best, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API