Legal Opinion
Howard v. Jessup
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 1973No. 45539PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for conversion of personal property.
Both plaintiff and defendant are partnerships. Defendant partnership is in business as a livestock commission firm in the Oklahoma City stockyards. The property allegedly converted was 41 head of cattle owned by plaintiff partnership. These cattle were stolen by one Pfeifer, who took them to the Oklahoma City stockyards and consigned them to defendant partnership which, as a livestock commission firm, sold them to third parties and accounted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sutter v. EasterlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- McJunkin v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- New England Mutual Life Insurance Company v. NullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.