Legal Opinion

Mizer v. Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District No. 2

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1951No. 38,549PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action by taxpayers to enjoin the officers of an irrigation district and the district itself from proceeding pursuant to a contract with the federal government. Judgment was for the plaintiffs. Defendants have appealed.

The petition alleged first the action was brought by four named plaintiffs and certain other persons similarly situated; that one defendant was an incorporated irrigation district and the three named defendants were the elected members of the board of directors of the district.

The petition then alleged that each of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Emery v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Marks v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Fleming Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. In Re the Master Contract Between the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict & United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sorlien v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API