Legal Opinion
Breathe Technologies, Inc. v. New Aera, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 17, 2020No. 5:19-cv-07691Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BREATHE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 8 Case No. 5:19-cv-07691-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 10 NEW AERA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 56 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court is Defendant Inogen, Inc. (“Inogen”) and Defendant Todd W. Allum’s 15 Motion to Dismiss, Compel Arbitration, and Stay. Dkt. No. 56 (“Motion to Compel”). Defendant 16 Silverbow Development LLC (“Silverbow,” and collectively with Inogen and Allum, 17 “Defendants”) filed a Joinder in the Motion as well…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Bridge Fund Capital Corp. v. Fastbucks Franchise Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Goldman v. KPMG, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- John Murphy v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.