Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Rural Electric Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commisson

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1875 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

This appeal results from an order of respondent, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), which held that intervenor, Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) was the proper retail electrical supplier for an entire enclosed shopping mall (Cranberry Mall) located in Cranberry Township, Venango County. The present dispute involves an interpretation of various provisions of the Retail Electric Supplier Unincorporated Area Certified Territory Act (Act), Act of July 30, 1975, P.L. 113, 15 P.S. §3277 (Supp. 1983-84), a portion of which provides:

This act shall apply only to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Somerset Rural Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. United Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. United Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API