Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1990No. 640 C.D. 1989Published

1DissentBarbieri, Senior Judge

I respectfully dissent. As the majority has stated, the outcome here turns on whether Reitz’ garage and storage facility constitutes a separate “electric consuming facility” for purposes of the Retail Electric Supplier Unincorporated Area Certified Territory Act (Act), or whether these structures are part of a larger “electric consuming facility” which includes the Reitz residence and additional garage structures. In my view, the administrative law judge and *364the Commission reached the correct result in determining that, based on the facts presented here, the residence and other structures…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Rural Electric Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API