Legal Opinion

Zanzig v. H.P.M. Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1985No. 83-3047PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

This appeal is from summary judgment for A. J. Antunes Company (defendant) in plaintiff’s personal injury action.

In his nine-count amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was seriously injured when molten aluminum overflowed from the die casting machine he was operating and splattered onto his legs. Counts I through VI, which were directed against the manufacturer and lessor of the machine, remain pending in the trial court and are not at issue in this appeal. Counts VII, VIII and IX sought recovery from defendant — the owner of the die — on theories of negligence, strict liability, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sears v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Firestone Steel Products Co. v. BarajasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mason v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Venzor v. Carmen's Pizza Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Loos v. American Energy Savers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Heiden v. OttingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API