Hedden v. Richard
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr.- Justice Shiras
delivered the opinion of the court.
At various times in the year 1886 the defendants in error imported into the port of New York certain articles of furniture, for the account of Jacob and Josef Kohn, of Yienna, Austria, the manufacturers and consignors thereof, which the collector, of the port classified as “ furniture finished,” under the provision for “ cabinet ware and house furniture, finished,” contained in Schedule D of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, and upon which he laid and collected duty at the rate of 35 per cent ad valorem. Against this classification and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. One Hundred and Twelve Casks of SugarSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mutual Benefit Life Ins. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Carter v. Liquid Carbonic Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.