Legal Opinion
United States v. Hinkley
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 30, 2015No. 14-1821PPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
In January 2014, Derek Hinkley entered a conditional guilty plea to one count under federal law of sexual exploitation of a minor. 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). As allowed by his plea agreement, he now appeals the district court’s denial of three motions to suppress. He also challenges his sentence of 300 months of imprisonment. We affirm his conviction and sentence.
I
As to the motions to suppress, we recite the relevant facts as found by the district court, consistent with record support. United States v. Arnott, 758 F.3d 40, 41 (1st Cir.2014). As to the facts relevant to the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. PonzoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Dana's Railroad Supply v. Attorney General, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Montijo-MaysonetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Acevedo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.