Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Anderten

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 28, 1954No. 3122Published

1DissentQuinn, Chief Judge

I dissent.

In the absence of the accused’s consent, use of depositions by the Government is expressly prohibit- ed in a case in which the death penalty may be imposed, except when "the convening authority shall have directed that the case be treated as not capital.” Article 49(f), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 624. Both the language of the Article, and our decision in United States v. Young, 2 USCMA 470, 9 CMR 100, make it clear that the prohibition is mandatory. The majority now hold that the notation of approval by the convening authority, endorsed upon the staff judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. KupferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API