United States v. Peter Frederick Fragus
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
The Court, sua sponte, has determined to supplement its prior opinion dated January 28, 1970. The supplement does not change the outcome there determined — we adhere to our affirmance of appellant’s conviction. However, since the date that opinion was released the United States Supreme Court has rendered two decisions of significant import to this case.
I
That Court affirmed the decision of a three-judge district court in Milky Way Products, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D., N.Y.1969); aff.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- State v. LavinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Meyer v. AustinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.