Legal Opinion

Goldsmith's Sons v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 11, 1925No. 2405PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

These are consolidated cases arising out of protests 976858, 980467, and 980634. The material imported was classified by the collector in *70each case as football leather under paragraph 1431, Tariff Act of 1922, which is as-follows:

Chamois skins, pianoforte, pianoforte-action, playerpiano-action leather, enameled upholstery leather, bag, strap, case, football, and glove leather, finished, in the white or in the crust, and seal, sheep, goat, and calf leather, dressed and finished, other than shoe leather, 20 per centum ad valorem.

In each…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Brin Bros. & Senegram v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. R. W. Greeff & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API