Goldsmith's Sons v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Graham, Presiding Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
These are consolidated cases arising out of protests 976858, 980467, and 980634. The material imported was classified by the collector in *70each case as football leather under paragraph 1431, Tariff Act of 1922, which is as-follows:
Chamois skins, pianoforte, pianoforte-action, playerpiano-action leather, enameled upholstery leather, bag, strap, case, football, and glove leather, finished, in the white or in the crust, and seal, sheep, goat, and calf leather, dressed and finished, other than shoe leather, 20 per centum ad valorem.
In each…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Brin Bros. & Senegram v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- R. W. Greeff & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.