Legal Opinion
Petty v. Dakota Barge Service
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1989No. Civ. 4-88-712Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion will be granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff Paul Petty initiated this action to recover for injuries he allegedly suffered during the course of his employment with defendant Dakota Barge Service (Dakota Barge). Dakota Barge is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in St. Paul, Minnesota. Dakota Barge is in the business of providing services to the barge industry on the Mississippi River. This action is brought pursuant to the Jones Act, 46…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.