Legal Opinion

Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1986No. 82-3693PublishedCited by 214 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

This case brings before the en banc court a question frequently confronted in this circuit: when is an offshore oilfield worker a “seaman” for purposes of the Jones Act? 1 We take the opportunity for en banc consideration of whether, after twenty-six years of development and interpretation, the test for Jones Act seaman status enunciated in Offshore Company v. Robison, 266 F.2d 769 (5th Cir.1959) should be modified.

The panel opinion, 752 F.2d 129, recites these facts to which we add only the material in brackets:

I

FACTS

In 1979, Tilden J. Elliott Contractor, Inc.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by214 opinions

  1. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Roberts v. Cardinal Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Johnnie Leonard, Sr. v. Dixie Well Service & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation, and Hytorc, M.E.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API