Legal Opinion

Meighan v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1932No. Docket No. 7621PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was riding as a guest of defendant in an automobile owned and operated by him. While traversing the highway, defendant collided with a cement base of a wigwag signal at a railroad crossing, wrecking his ear. The accident happened at Schuetzen Park crossing, south of San Jose, about 4 o ’clock A. M. In consequence of the collision, plain tiff suffered a broken arm and other injuries. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. From said verdict and the judgment entered thereunder,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Merrill v. Pacific Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Goodwin v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. People v. MarkhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Carson v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Walters v. Du FourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API