Legal Opinion
People v. Higgins
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1996No. 95CA0223PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge KAPELKE.
Defendant, Barry L. Higgins, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
In October of 1993, defendant was arrested and charged with cocaine-related offenses. Shortly thereafter, the district attorney brought a public nuisance action, seeking forfeiture of defendant’s home based on allegations that it constituted a public nuisance *899because it had been used by defendant in the sale and storage of cocaine. The district attorney later amended the complaint to add a claim for forfeiture of two cars owned by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. FrankColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. PattonColorado Court of Appeals · 2000