United States v. Robert O'Neal
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal presents two issues: (1) whether the district court committed reversible error in failing to properly present the question of drug type and quantity to the jury; and (2) whether the district court committed reversible error in failing to find that the quantity of cocaine that triggered mandatory sentences for two defendants was reasonably foreseeable to each defendant. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendants Leonard Sapp and Jeffery Sapp occupied a house owned by their parents in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Co-defendant Robert O’Neal lived nearby and frequented the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. PipkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DahdaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Sapp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.