Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert O'Neal

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 19, 2004No. 03-10559PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents two issues: (1) whether the district court committed reversible error in failing to properly present the question of drug type and quantity to the jury; and (2) whether the district court committed reversible error in failing to find that the quantity of cocaine that triggered mandatory sentences for two defendants was reasonably foreseeable to each defendant. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendants Leonard Sapp and Jeffery Sapp occupied a house owned by their parents in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Co-defendant Robert O’Neal lived nearby and frequented the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. PipkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. DahdaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Sapp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API