Legal Opinion
United States v. Pipkins
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 2, 2004No. 02-14306PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
In November of 2001, police arrested fifteen Atlanta pimps. A grand jury subsequently returned a 265-count indictment naming these fifteen pimps, involving conduct spanning from 1997 to November, 2001. Thirteen of the pimps named in the indictment pleaded guilty. Only two — Defendants Charles Floyd Pipkins and Andrew Moore (“the Defendants”) — proceeded to trial. The evidence at trial demonstrated that Pipkins and Moore prostituted juvenile females— at least one of whom was as young as 12 — from at least 1997 until their arrest in late 2001. The Defendants…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. James P. HornadayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Rosalba Cisneros v. Petland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. NascimentoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.