Legal Opinion
Jaconski v. McCloskey & Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 1958No. Civ. A. 25186PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
The civil action for damages was commenced by plaintiff, Vincent Jaconski, against defendant, McCloskey & Company, in this Court by the filing of a Summons and Complaint on August 11, 1958. In his Complaint, plaintiff alleges that on April 2, 1958, while in the course of his employment by Westinghouse Electric Corporation, he was injured when struck by “a heavy metal extension nipple.” He further alleges that the occurrence took place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and that the object with which he was struck was in the exclusive possession and control of the defendant,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gavin v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Knoblock v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Emma v. Hudson & Manhattan R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Seavey v. Boston & Maine R. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Gavin v. Hudson & Manhattan R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wagner v. Sperry Univac, Division of Sperry Rand Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mattson v. Cuyuna Ore CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Kozikowski v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Hudak v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Fitzgerald v. Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.