Legal Opinion
Hudak v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (“Path”) to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (1). For reasons to be set forth, the motion must be denied.
Path is a subsidiary corporation of The-Port of New York Authority (the “Authority”), which Authority is a body corporate created by compact between the-States of New York and New Jersey, with the consent of Congress (42 Stat. 174). Path was incorporated in 1962 after the-legislatures of New York and New Jersey had each enacted legislation for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Richard D. Di Frischia v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Evans-Hailey Company v. Crane CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Gavin v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Knoblock v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Emma v. Hudson & Manhattan R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Seavey v. Boston & Maine R. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acton Corporation v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- French v. Clinchfield Coal Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Kozikowski v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Da Cruz v. Towmasters of New Jersey, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Smith v. Arundel Cooperative, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.