Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Cuyuna Ore Company

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1960No. 5-59 Civil 32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This action for breach of contract based on certain lease agreements was' commenced by service of summons and complaint on August 7, 1959. Motions to dismiss by the defendant and to amend the complaint have been made and disposed of. 1

The instant second motion to dismiss is directed at the complaint and is based upon all the files, proceedings, depositions in the case, and the supporting affidavit of Everett L. Joppa dated December 29, 1959, and the opposing affidavit of Robert R. Alderman dated January 5, 1960. Jurisdiction is invoked on plaintiffs’ claim of diversity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Harry E. Kern v. Standard Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. Continental Coal Corp. v. Roszelle Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. In re Elmira Steel Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1901
  5. Home Powder Co. v. GeisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Blair Riggs v. Island Creek Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Power and Light Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  4. Lurie Company v. Loew's San Francisco Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
  5. Bonar, Inc. v. SchottlandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API