Legal Opinion

State v. Touchberry

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1922No. 10899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

The defendants were convicted of violating the provisions of an Act entitled “An Act to provide for the registration of vehicles in Clarendon County, to fix a license therefor and to direct the disposition of fees therefrom,” approved the 11th day of March, 1920 (Taws 1920, p. 922). The Act recpiires the registry of all vehicles owned by persons, firms or corporations in Clarendon County, provides that licenses and marker shall be issued to applicants for such registration, and imposes license fees for such vehicles as follows:

“Each…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Carolina Grocery Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Carroll v. Town of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. Cowart v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Hill v. Council of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Moseley v. WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Law County Board v. SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API