Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Wheat Ridge v. Cerveny

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 1, 1996No. 94SC521Published

1DissentJustice Lohr

The majority interprets a clause within article X, section 20(1), of the Colorado Constitution to mean that plaintiffs who prevail in individual or class action enforcement suits with respect to the provisions of that section are not mandatorily entitled to reasonable attorney fees. Maj. op. at 1115. Instead, the majority concludes that the award of such fees to successful plaintiffs is discretionary with the trial court. Id. The majority therefore reverses the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals, which arrived at a contrary conclusion. See Cerveny v. City of Wheat Ridge, 888 P.2d 339,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kenneth j.yablonski and Joseph A. Yablonski v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing Company, W. H. Wood v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Dixie Cup Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  4. Alfred v. Emmanuel, and Cross-Appellant v. Omaha Carpenters District Council, a Labor Organization, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Cerveny v. City of Wheat RidgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API