Legal Opinion

Huse v. East China Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1951No. Docket 22, Calendar 44,839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

The several plaintiffs aré “lot owners” in the Bose Hill cemetery of East China township in St. Clair county. The individual defendants are members of the township board and board of health. Each board was joined as a defendant.

In 1906, the township board of health acquired title to certain property which was added to and made a part of the cemetery. On June 24, 1948, at a meeting of the township board, at which Supervisor Snodgrass, Justices Marsa and Uppleger, Treasurer Mc-Causland, and Cleric Garliclc were present, the following resolution was adopted:

“Motion by Justice Uppleger and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetherby v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Richmond Hills Memorial Park Ass'n v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rowley v. Laingsburg Cemetery Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warda v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF FLUSHINGMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Evergreen-Washelli Memorial Park Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Spencer v. FLINT MEMORIAL PARK ASSN.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Huse v. East China Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Warda v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF FLUSHINGMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API