Legal Opinion

Wetherby v. City of Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 96, Calendar No. 36,997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, a duly licensed embalmer, undertaker, and funeral director, attacks, by bill in equity, as invalid, certain rules and regulations of the city commission of the city of Jackson, and seeks to restrain defendants from enforcing the same against him; seeks an injunction against the superintendent of cemeteries, and complains of the misconduct of the superintendent of cemeteries of defendant city. Prom a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals. The important question is the validity of the rules and regulations of defendants attacked. These are, that funerals, while within the cemetery…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Andrews v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kincaid's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Upjohn v. Board of HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reed v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Johnson v. Cedar Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Inch Memorials v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Huse v. East China Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pine Crest Memorial Park v. BurtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API