Legal Opinion

Huse v. East China Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1951No. Docket 22, Calendar 44,839Published

1Opinion of the Court

330 Mich. 465 (1951)

47 N.W.2d 696

HUSE

v.

EAST CHINA TOWNSHIP BOARD.

Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 44,839.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 14, 1951.

D.J. McColl, Jr. (Charles Upton Shreve, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Milton W. Bush, for defendants.

BUSHNELL, J.

The several plaintiffs are "lot owners" in the Rose Hill cemetery of East China township in St. Clair county. The individual defendants are members of the township board and board of health. Each board was joined as a defendant.

In 1906, the township board of health acquired title to certain property which was added to and made a part of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tracy v. BittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Glasgow v. NichollsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ritter v. CouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Clapp v. VatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API