Mt. Jefferson Carpets v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
In these consolidated cases petitioners were engaged in the business of selling carpets but contracted with others to lay the carpets for them. The respondent Employment Division determined that the carpet layers were employes of petitioners for whom contributions must be paid and that payroll taxes were properly assessed against petitioners. Petitioners contend that the carpet layers were independent contractors and exempt from contribution under ORS 657.040. 1
The burden is on the petitioners to establish that an individual to whom compensation was paid falls within the exemption.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Barger v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Culp v. PeetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Kuhlman v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Timberland Sales, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- TETON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Isaac's Design Emporium v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977