Legal Opinion

Culp v. Peet

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from judgment of the circuit court reversing a hearing officer’s decision that seven or eight subcontractors were in fact employes for whom plaintiff was legally required to make contributions to the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund. The plaintiff had been assessed for payments which were allegedly due from 1963 through 1966.

During the time involved, plaintiff was a con struction contractor engaged in building homes and small business buildings. His evidence showed that he contracted with these particular artisans to do specialized jobs such as finish cabinets,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baker v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Union Avenue Social Club, Inc. v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dick v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MICHELET, SOWERS, JOHNSON & COMPANY v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Barger v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Kuhlman v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. TETON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API