Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Stewart

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1949No. S. F. No. 17319Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This case involves the legality and enforceability of privately imposed restrictions against occupation of a lot of land by non-Caucasians. The trial court enjoined occupance of the lot by defendants, non-Caucasians. Defendants appealed.

Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. 1161, 3 A.L.R.2d 441] (see, also, Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. 1187]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the judgment óf the trial court must be reversed. (See Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API