Coleman v. Stewart
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This case involves the legality and enforceability of privately imposed restrictions against occupation of a lot of land by non-Caucasians. The trial court enjoined occupance of the lot by defendants, non-Caucasians. Defendants appealed.
Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. 1161, 3 A.L.R.2d 441] (see, also, Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. 1187]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the judgment óf the trial court must be reversed. (See Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.