Legal Opinion

People v. Baranko

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1962No. Crim. 7918PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendants Baranko and Fisher were jointly charged with violations of the bookmaking statute. The cause was submitted to the trial court on the transcript of the preliminary hearing; Baranko was found guilty of bookmaking in violation of section 337a, subdivision 1, Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment of conviction. Appellant contends that the arrest of codefendant Fisher was not valid thus the subsequent search and seizure were unlawful; that his arrest was not based on probable cause, search of the premises was not incident to a lawful arrest and betting markers and bookmaking…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. RosalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mann v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. SamuelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API