Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Greatway Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 17, 2000No. 99-1329PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶1. American Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals a judgment of the circuit court determining that Trisha Taylor can recover under the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage provisions of two of its auto policies. Taylor argues, and the circuit court agreed, that the reducing clauses of both policies created illusory coverage; and therefore, her reasonable expectations mandate coverage. Because we conclude that Ross Hermanson's vehicle was not an underinsured motor vehicle as defined in the policies, each of which provides underinsured motorist benefits in an amount greater than the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cunningham v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ile v. Foremost InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Malik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. Ginder v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API