Legal Opinion

National Transit Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 2, 1925No. 3259PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

By contract dated April 22, 1898, the Erie Railroad, a corporation of New York, permitted the National Transit Company, a corporation of New York, engaged in transporting oil by pipe line, to lay its pipe on the railroad’s right of way. By such contract the latter company agreed “to indemnify and save harmless the party of the first part from and against all claims, suits, costs, losses and expenses, in any manner resulting from, or arising out of, the laying, maintenance, renewal, repair, use or existence of said pipe (whether heretofore or hereafter laid) ineluding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bates v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Enders v. EndersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MahoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. Catalytic Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  5. Aluminum Co. Of America v. HullyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API