Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Marion Superior Court; Vinson Garter, Judge. Action by Ambrose Russell against the Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co-., for an injury sustained while acting as a porter on a Pullman sleeping car attached to defendant’s train. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
This was an action by the appellant, Ambrose Russell, against the- appellee, The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago- and St. Louis Railway Company, for an injury sustained by appellant while acting as a porter upon a Pullman sleeping car attached to appellee’s passenger train. The complaint alleged that on the 21st day of August, 1898, appellee operated a railway line through this State; that near the town of Cementville, Indiana, a sidetrack ran parallel to-, and a few feet from, the side of the main track o-f appellee’s line, and was used by the appellee in switching and operating cars; that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- National Transit Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Payne v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.