Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Mahoney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1897No. 17,933PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

In December, 1894, Oscar P. J. Bomick was an employe of the Adams Express Company, at the city of Logansport, caring for express matter entering and going from said city on the line of the appellant’s railway. Between two and three o’clock on the morning of the 13th of said month, while passing from the south side of appellant’s two parallel tracks, near the passenger depot, and from the express company’s storeroom to the north side of said tracks, said Bomick entered between two cars of a. passenger train, separated by a space of from six to ten feet, just as additional cars were driven…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mynard v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. Johnson's Adm'x v. Richmond & Danville R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Koontz-Wagner Electric Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. National Transit Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API