Davies v. Grossmont Union High School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal challenges the enforceability of a contract provision restricting appellant’s right to run for public office. The provision is contained in a settlement agreement between appellant and the governmental entity involved. That agreement in turn formed the basis for a “dismissal and release and order thereon.” We hold that the public policy favoring enforcement of such a provision is outweighed by the public policy served by its non-enforcement. We therefore declare the provision void as contrary to public policy and reverse the district court’s contempt order…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NoahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Gebert v. Transport Administrative ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Coplin v. Conejo Valley Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Radcliffe v. Purdue Pharma L.P.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
- United States v. Transport Administrative ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.