Legal Opinion

Driggers v. Commercial Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1976No. 7618SC434PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The only question properly before us for review is the interpretation placed upon G.S. 1A-1, Rule 13(a), by the trial judge. We express no opinion upon Driggers’ allegations of fraud or the alleged damages arising therefrom.

The pertinent provisions of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 13(a), are:

“A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim ...”

As can be seen, the rule refers to a claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Country Club of Johnston County, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Stines v. SatterwhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Fogarty v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. COUNTRY CLUB v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API