Legal Opinion

Stines v. Satterwhite

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 1982No. 8110SC1029PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

A calendar of events involving the building of the Stines’ house reveals the following facts:

Godwin Building Supply Company, Inc. [hereinafter referred to as Godwin] furnished materials for the construction of the house, but did so only with the understanding that the materials were charged to both Satterwhite and the Stines. The bills for materials furnished were not paid. On 11 April 1979, Satterwhite brought an action, case No. 79CVS2219, against the Stines for materials and labor totaling $22,267.80. The Stines answered with a general denial, but admitted the contract between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Driggers v. Commercial Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Country Club of Johnston County, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Smithwick v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Bruggeman v. Meditrust Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Morris v. Southeastern Orthopedics Sports MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Smithwick v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API