Verna v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
This appeal requires us to construe the term “unimproved land” for the purposes of levying a real estate conveyance tax pursuant to General Statutes § 12-494.*1 The trial court concluded that the demoli*104tion of an industrial building and the abatement of pollution on the property constituted improvements to the real property of the plaintiffs, Vincenzo Verna and Patricia Verna, and, therefore, that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the conveyance tax rate for unimproved land under § 12-494. We affirm the judgment of the trial court on the alternate ground that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grigerik v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pequonnock Yacht Club, Inc. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Jeffery v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Metropolitan District v. Town of BarkhamstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SandovalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sleasman v. City of LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- New England Pipe Corp. v. Northeast Corridor FoundationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Sleasman v. City of LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Plato Associates, LLC v. Environmental Compliance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.