Legal Opinion

Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1929No. Docket No. 6416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Action in conversion; plaintiff claimed to be the owner of fourteen tons of raisins grown during 1926 on land owned by one George Betel. These raisins were seized by the defendant sheriff while they were in sweat boxes on the land of Betel; defendant was acting under a writ of attachment in an action entitled Dauer v. Betel, and the raisins were seized as the property of Betel. In April, 1923, Betel had signed a contract with plaintiff’s assignor commonly known as the “raisin contract.”

The first and chief point raised by appellant is that under this instrument the title to the raisins…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arques v. WassonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McLaughlin v. PiattiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Turner, Kuhn & Fraser, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Hamilton v. KlinkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Wanee v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Black v. Solano Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Aiello v. SliskovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Merriman v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Zeff v. Harvey Smith Oldsmobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API