Boyer v. Israel
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Mr. Boyer attacks his conviction for first degree murder on the grounds that the state trial court instructed the jury that it could presume the essential element of intent from the petitioner’s acts. A jury instruction involving such a presumption was found to be unconstitutional in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).
The respondents raise several arguments to support the conviction, including the petitioner’s failure to exhaust state remedies and his failure to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Boyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Ross v. IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drinkwater v. GagnonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Cooper v. IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- Willie Lee Pigee v. Thomas R. Israel and Bronson C. LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Willie Lee Pigee v. Thomas R. Israel and Bronson C. LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982