Drinkwater v. Gagnon
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, Chief Judge.
In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Willie Lee Drinkwater challenges his convictions for armed robbery and attempted murder, party to a crime, on the grounds that the trial court improperly instructed the jury that it could presume the crucial element of intent from Mr. Drinkwater’s acts. The Supreme Court found a similar instruction unconstitutional in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).
The respondents raise several arguments to support the convictions, including the claim that Sandstrom does not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cool v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Bowman v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cooper v. IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- Willie Lee Pigee v. Thomas R. Israel and Bronson C. LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Willie Lee Pigee v. Thomas R. Israel and Bronson C. LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982