Armour Leather Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
These unemployment compensation cases arise out of a work stoppage which the referee and the Board of Review, in reversing the Bureau of Employment Security, found to be a lockout. If the claimants were *192locked out by their employer, they are entitled to unemployment compensation. If they were not locked out, they are disqualified by section 402 of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 48 PS §802(d), which provides, inter alia:
“An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week— ... (d) In which his unemployment is due to a stoppage of work, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Byerly Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of BeviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In the Interest of RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. TroleneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.