Legal Opinion
Riemers v. Anderson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 2004No. 20030317, 20030318PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland C. Riemers appealed a district court memorandum decision and order for judgment 1 denying his motions for default judgment and summary judgment, granting defense motions for summary judgment, dismissing his complaints, and awarding costs and disbursements in his actions against Traill County Deputy Sheriff Paul Anderson, Traill County Sheriff Michael Crocker, Traill County State’s Attorney Stuart Larson, the City of May-ville, Patrolman Paul Borud, and Trooper David Pulju. We conclude one claim is barred by the doctrine of collateral estop-pel and the other has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robert A. Buell v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Beazley v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Mann v. ND Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Knoll v. KuleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Laufer v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.