Legal Opinion

State v. Batungbacal

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1996No. 18415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

Defendant-appellant Ray Adam Batungbacal, pursuant to his conditional plea of guilty to promoting a dangerous drug in the first degree, 1 appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the circuit court’s denial of Batungbacal’s motion to dismiss and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD)

Drafted in 1956 by the Council of State Governments, the IAD is an interstate compact among forty-eight…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. WilloughbyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Diaz v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Widmer-BaumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API